This post will be a quick one to update my readers on an earlier post regarding how trusts used for asset protection hold up in divorce. In this earlier post, I made the argument that in New Jersey, to be on the safe side, when seeking to protect a child's inheritance from a potential future divorce we should try to avoid placing "ascertainable standards" into trust distribution language. [For an explanation of what an "ascertainable standard" is and why I was worried, click here see the earlier post.]
It turns out that ascertainable standards in New Jersey trusts may now be OK after all. The New Jersey Supreme Court just released its opinion in Tannen v. Tannen which upholds the appellate court decision referenced in my prior post. This means it is now the law of the land in New Jersey that discretionary trusts (even those that make use of an ascertainable standard such as health, education, maintenance, and support) cannot be factored into an alimony award against a trust beneficiary.
This strengthens the divorce protection from trusts in this State, and makes it even easier for parents to protect their children's future inheritances from a child's potential future divorcing spouse or bad financial decisions.
The simple lesson to take away from this decision is that with proper planning with a qualified attorney, you can create a financial safety net for your loved ones after you're gone that won't be lost even if they find themselves in a messy divorce. Feel free to contact me if you're interested in learning how to protect your heirs' inheritances from divorce using trusts.
TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: Any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by you for the purpose of (1) avoiding any penalty that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service or (2) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Everything posted here is for educational purposes only, and is not to be construed as legal advice. Do not take any action, postpone any action, or decline to take any proposed action based on this information without first engaging the representation of me or another qualified attorney. Nothing posted on Twitter or on any website shall be construed in any way as legal advice.
DISCLAIMER: I am an attorney and a CPA, however I am neither your attorney nor your CPA, and therefore no communications between us are covered by attorney-client or accountant-client privilege unless you possess a signed document which states that I currently represent you as an attorney or a CPA. In the case that such a document exists, the existence or waiver of attorney-client privilege or accountant-client privilege shall be controlled by the signed fee agreement or engagement letter.